How to Measure Performance: Outcomes vs. Outputs

— March 27, 2019

Real trust can only grow when people know how the organization’s performance will be judged. In my experience, people align themselves around whatever is being measured like particles of iron around a magnet. That’s why the scorecard is such a critical part of sharpening the focus.

A scorecard needs to capture three different dimensions:

  • What will be measured (the metric)
  • What you’ll aim for (the target)
  • The current performance (the baseline)

When measuring success, distinguish between inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes. Outcomes measure the actual value you’re creating, like satisfied customers or financial profitability, and they are the key to high performance. This is shown here in the “stairway to performance.”

How to Measure Performance: Outcomes vs. Outputs

Too often I find organizations where leaders are deep in the weeds, tracking the number of sales calls per salesperson or the quantity of units produced, not the results in terms of satisfied customers, retention of key clients, or profitability. Not only does this produce skewed performance measures but it also breeds turf battles. So when you’re putting together your scorecard, make sure you’re focusing on the right stuff.

Outcomes vs. Outputs

When a large health care system in California started measuring health outcomes, a surprising thing happened: patient health increased, while at the same time, health care costs declined. Why this surprising result? A major factor was that doctors started looking at the performance measures and teaming up to treat the sickest people. As a result, the number of “frequent fliers” – people who regularly sought medical care – decreased dramatically.

Paying attention to outcomes pays off in big ways. Yet many companies fail to take the time to systematically figure out how to measure performance. As a result, the business doesn’t flourish as it should. Instead, it stagnates.

When we work with our clients, we help them look holistically at the organization and develop a set of performance measures that tracks outcomes rather than outputs. We then help ensure that the information is communicated throughout the organization on a regular basis – via forums in which people talk about performance, look at trends, and focus on areas where the organization is not meeting its targets.

Sharing performance information in this manner aligns people around a common set of goals and focuses everyone’s attention on how to improve the organization’s performance. It also builds trust when people see that leaders are holding everyone accountable. Done well, a strong set of performance measures will raise the organization to a higher level of success.

Originally published here.

Business & Finance Articles on Business 2 Community

Author: Eric Douglas

View full profile ›

(148)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.